Human oversight
High-risk AI systems must be designed to enable effective human oversight. InkSign records evidence of meaningful human involvement — for your own compliance analysis, not as a determination of compliance itself.
A record that a qualified person actually engaged with an AI-assisted decision before it went out.
AI systems increasingly draft, flag, and recommend decisions people used to make alone — a denial, a rejection, a filtered application. InkSign is the protocol's answer to a question regulators are starting to ask directly: did a qualified person actually review it? Reviewers attest on the surface where the decision was made, and that attestation becomes a record — duration, artifact coverage, override facts — built for organizations preparing for human-oversight duties under the EU AI Act and CCPA automated-decision rules.
AI-oversight attestation · Reviewer-side · Founder pilot
A loan is declined. A claim is denied. An application is filtered. Increasingly, an AI system's recommendation is attached — and "human in the loop" has been a checkbox, not a record.
An AI-assisted decision can be generated, attached to a case, and delivered in seconds. The review step, if it happens at all, is the only place a person still touches the outcome.
"Reviewed by a human" has typically meant a status field someone — or a script — sets to true. Nothing records what was actually looked at, or for how long.
The EU AI Act's human-oversight duties and California's automated-decision rules both point at the same gap: organizations need to show oversight happened, not just declare that it did.
InkSign is built to close that gap — as a record, not a policy memo.
Four steps. Everything else is configuration for your review program.
The record is the attestation plus what it covered — never a judgment on the underlying decision.
High-risk AI systems must be designed to enable effective human oversight. InkSign records evidence of meaningful human involvement — for your own compliance analysis, not as a determination of compliance itself.
California's automated-decision-technology rules point at a meaningful human review path for certain decisions. InkSign records that a qualified person engaged, and what they covered, at the moment they did.
Engagement facts — duration, artifact coverage — are recorded alongside the attestation. A click is not the record; what it covered is.
InkSign records that review happened and what was covered — never a reviewer's private reasoning, keystrokes, or unrelated activity.
InkSign documents that oversight occurred. It does not adjudicate whether the underlying AI-assisted decision was itself correct or compliant.
Every attestation lands in a tamper-evident, append-only audit trail. Once written, an oversight record cannot be quietly edited, backdated, or removed — the log only ever grows.
InkSign is onboarding a small number of organizations preparing for EU AI Act Article 14 and CCPA oversight duties, one review program at a time. Pilot access is by request.